That is effective, however I do not actually admire being advised I’m ‘fallacious’, now we have totally different opinions however that is all they’re. Just about every little thing you might be writing is an opinion not any type of truth.
With that stated, I just do wish to reply a few your factors.
It is quite common, search Google: “Litespeed WordPress 403 error” and “Litespeed WordPress 503 error” yow will discover a whole lot of outcomes
Sure, true. I simply looked for ‘LiteSpeed WordPress 403 error’ and obtained 36,300 outcomes. I additionally looked for ‘nginx WordPress 403 errror’ and obtained 453,000 outcomes. I did not seek for Apache, however I am certain there are many these as effectively.
For lots of people nginx config is much more advanced just because they’re used to utilizing Apache and so something following the identical acquainted config system is nice for them.
Once more, are we speaking about stability and high-traffic safety? (sure I’m) then .htaccess is a joke to contemplate together with that… whenever you say “however folks prefer it” I believe you actually imply that shared cPanel internet hosting corporations prefer it as a result of they’ll put 100 clients on the server utilizing .htacess and vhosts
No, that is not what I imply, see my level above. It is also not essentially unstable or an enormous safety danger relying on how every little thing is ready up.
actually that is your inaccurate assertion as a result of LS Cache is likely one of the heaviest most bloated WordPress plugins ever created within the cache class… that they had like 50 totally different options and tons of javascript loading… large codebase, many of the options will not be associated to Litespeed server both
I am not going to enter into an enormous debate about what the perfect caching to make use of for a WP web site is, however I disagree with you. In our inside pace checks with about 12 totally different WP caching plugins, all setup accurately, the LSCache plugin on an LSWS server and utilizing Redis is all the time within the prime 3 quickest.
the ESI function is likely one of the silly options ever made for WordPress cache plugins, how can the typical WordPress web site even start to configure that accurately? that’s made for bloated websites that attempted to cover some unhealthy efficiency… however you want some genius to configure correctly
ESI is extremely helpful and the config for it with the LSCache plugin is admittedly easy it simply includes including a shortcode to areas of the location you wish to exclude from the cache.
It has nothing in any respect to do with bloat or hiding unhealthy efficiency, it permits you to set for much longer cache occasions for the entire static content material on the location, whereas guaranteeing that dynamic parts are by no means outdated.
please discover any websites from Alexa High 100 utilizing Litespeed server? I by no means noticed any… solely Nginx significantly
Placing apart the truth that Alexa metric is massively flawed and never an actual illustration of something in any respect, I haven’t got the time or inclination to have a look at what servers every of their ‘prime’ websites is utilizing, however…
I’d guess that quite a lot of the highest 10 will probably be utilizing GWS as a result of they are going to be owned by Google, I might additionally guess that quite a bit will report as CloudFlare Server and will not expose what precise server the location is hosted on. Of no matter quantity are left, in all probability about 45%-50% will probably be nginx, with the remainder cut up between Apache, LiteSpeed (I might guess in all probability simply 2-3%) and different servers.
However the prime 100 websites which have large quantities of visitors will not be consultant of what most individuals are doing or have to do, they’re websites which have enormous dev groups and extremely skilled sys admins, with little restrict to sources. They should optimise issues in ways in which the overwhelming majority of web sites do not and I assure that no matter server they’re operating on, it isn’t a fast ‘out of the field’ set up however a extremely optimised one to suit their very own wants.
On the danger of sounding repetitive and boring, each of the servers underneath dialogue listed below are superb, for a few of the identical and a few totally different causes. To trash both of them and declare that the opposite is so significantly better is solely not true.