Editor’s Notice: This story initially appeared on HireAHelper.
In recent times, public well being officers have been attempting to boost consciousness of the destructive results of a typical each day exercise: sitting.
Whereas sitting will be useful for resting and sustaining the physique, sitting for extended durations with restricted bodily exercise reduces power expenditure and cardiovascular health, which contributes to various adversarial well being circumstances. Sitting can enhance the chance of weight problems, blood clots, hypertension, excessive blood sugar, and excessive ldl cholesterol.
It might additionally enhance the chance of coronary heart illness, diabetes, and even most cancers. It impacts posture, stiffens joints, and contributes to tightness and pressure within the again, hamstrings, and hips. With this lengthy record of potential well being penalties, some well being professionals argue that “sitting is the brand new smoking.”
To find out the places with the best focus of staff who sit, researchers at HireAHelper used knowledge from O*NET’s Occupation-Stage Sitting Rating and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics.
Listed below are the cities with the best focus of staff who sit.
15. Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA
- Composite index: 49.62
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 5.2%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 12.5%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 51,220
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 122,450
14. Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ
- Composite index: 49.62
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.8%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 12.1%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 143,740
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 255,610
13. Los Angeles-Lengthy Seashore-Anaheim, CA
- Composite index: 49.77
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 5.9%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 11.4%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 337,840
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 651,310
12. Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
- Composite index: 49.81
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 5.9%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 11.7%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 73,510
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 146,520
11. Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
- Composite index: 50.23
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.1%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 11.5%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 111,310
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 209,130
10. Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO
- Composite index: 50.32
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.5%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 12.1%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 95,220
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 177,500
9. Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- Composite index: 50.64
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.3%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 12.1%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 120,020
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 232,540
8. Hartford-East Hartford-Middletown, CT
- Composite index: 51.03
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.5%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 10.0%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 35,130
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 54,370
7. Salt Lake Metropolis, UT
- Composite index: 51.34
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.6%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 11.7%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 49,410
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 86,700
6. Austin-Spherical Rock-Georgetown, TX
- Composite index: 51.52
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.7%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 12.4%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 71,840
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 132,560
5. New York-Newark-Jersey Metropolis, NY-NJ-PA
- Composite index: 51.67
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.6%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 10.5%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 569,830
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 915,440
4. Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
- Composite index: 51.93
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.1%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 10.8%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 156,970
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 278,950
3. San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA
- Composite index: 52.28
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 7.2%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 10.6%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 160,430
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 236,880
2. Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
- Composite index: 53.80
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 6.4%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 11.0%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 186,320
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 321,290
1. San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
- Composite index: 54.02
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 7.5%
- Share of staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 9.2%
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady sitting: 79,810
- Whole staff in jobs requiring steady standing: 98,760
Methodology
The information used on this evaluation is from O*NET’s Occupation-Stage Sitting Rating and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics. To find out the places with the best focus of staff who sit, researchers calculated a composite index, which is an employment-weighted common of every occupation’s O*NET sitting rating for every location. Within the occasion of a tie, the placement with the larger share of staff in jobs requiring steady sitting — these with an O*NET rating of 90 or above — was ranked greater. To enhance relevance, solely metropolitan areas with at the very least 100,000 residents had been included.
Disclosure: The knowledge you learn right here is at all times goal. Nevertheless, we typically obtain compensation if you click on hyperlinks inside our tales.